Review anal dating com

The majority of the apps did not contain any sexual health content.

Part 2: We reviewed 60 dating apps: 44 (73%) targeting heterosexual users, 9 (15%) targeting men who have sex with men (MSM), 3 (5%) targeting lesbian women, and 4 (7%) for group dating.

Integrating sexual health promotion into established apps might be a more effective method.

The objective of our study was to critically review popular sex-related apps and dating apps, in order to ascertain whether they contain any sexual health content.

Users also reveal significant increases in casual sex since starting online dating [16].

Rice et al reported that 75% of Grindr subscribers had had sex with people they met through the app, and 15% reported unprotected anal sex with sexual partners from Grindr [8].

Users can easily identify other users by physical proximity.In recent years, due to the increasing use of smartphones, apps designed to provide sexual health information and education are readily available on the market [23].However, these apps are infrequently downloaded, have low user ratings, and are unlikely to reach the target groups [23].The likelihood of young MSM engaging in unprotected anal intercourse was 3 times higher among Grindr users than nonusers [11], and users reported a higher prevalence than nonusers of ever being diagnosed with sexually transmissible infections (STIs) [9].Sexual health interventions that are integrated with modern technologies have been successful [17-22].

Search for Review anal dating com:

Review anal dating com-81

Smartphone apps provide a new platform for information distribution and networking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Review anal dating com”